{# Generated per-post OG image: cover + headline rendered onto a 1200×630 PNG by apps/blog/og_image.py. Cached for 24 h via cache_page on the URL pattern; immutable Cache-Control so social crawlers don't refetch. #} Перейти к содержимому
>_ KeyGroup / blog

Новая эра штрафов для платформ: разъяснение структуры штрафов DSA и DMA

The days of tech giants operating in regulatory gray zones are coming to an end in the European Union. With the introduction of the Digital Services Act (DSA) и the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the EU isn’t just rewriting the rules of the digital game—it’s building an entire enforcement stadium, compl

updated 6 дней, 17 часов ago Legal consulting Victoria Hayes 10 мин чтения 7 просмотров
{# Banner is the LCP image — fetchpriority=high stays on the JPEG so the browser starts loading immediately even if AVIF/WebP haven't been content-negotiated yet. w=1680 covers retina desktop. #} Новая эра штрафов для платформ: разъяснение структуры штрафов DSA и DMA
{# body_html is precompiled at save time (apps.blog.signals.precompile_body_html). Fall back to runtime `|md` on the off-chance an old post slipped past the backfill — keeps the page from rendering blank. #}

The days of tech giants operating in regulatory gray zones are coming to an end in the European Union. With the introduction of the Digital Services Act (DSA) и the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the EU isn’t just rewriting the rules of the digital game—it’s building an entire enforcement stadium, complete with referees, instant replays, и very real yellow и red cards in the form of massive fines.

If you’re a platform operator, legal advisor, or simply a digital citizen wondering how Europe plans to rein in the world’s biggest online players, buckle up. Understиing the penalty structures under the DSA и DMA is no longer optional; it’s essential. These laws pack teeth, и they’re already biting.

Why the EU Is Getting Tough on Platforms

The rationale behind the DSA и DMA is clear: digital platforms wield unprecedented influence over commerce, speech, data, и democracy. For too long, enforcement mechanisms were either toothless or tied up in years-long investigations that allowed violations to continue unchecked. The new regime aims to change that.

  • DSA focuses on making online platforms safer и more transparent. It deals with content moderation, algorithmic accountability, user rights, и systemic risk mitigation.

  • DMA targets gatekeeper platforms that dominate digital markets. It’s about ensuring fair competition, preventing abuse of market power, и protecting business users.

Both laws share one thing: big consequences for non-compliance.

Penalties Under the Digital Services Act (DSA)

The DSA’s enforcement framework is designed to be proportionate but impactful. It introduces a clear fine structure for platforms that fail to meet their obligations.

Key Figures:

  • Up to 6% of global annual turnover for serious violations.

  • Периодические штрафные выплаты of up to 5% of daily income or turnover to enforce compliance.

What Triggers Fines?

  • Failure to remove illegal content after notice.

  • Not providing transparency around advertising or recommender systems.

  • Ignoring obligations for risk assessments or mitigation strategies.

  • Failing to cooperate with the European Commission or national authorities.

These aren’t theoretical penalties. If your platform has €10 billion in annual revenue, that’s €600 million on the line—for one breach.

Who Enforces?

  • National Digital Services Coordinators (DSCs) hиle most enforcement.

  • The European Commission takes the lead for Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) и Very Large Online Search Engines (VLOSEs).

Platforms have appeal mechanisms, but fines can be imposed even while legal disputes are ongoing. That means your compliance strategy can’t wait for court rulings—it must be ready now.

Penalties Under the Digital Markets Act (DMA)

The DMA is even more aggressive when it comes to enforcement, reflecting the seriousness of tackling entrenched gatekeepers.

Key Figures:

  • Up to 10% of global annual turnover for initial violations.

  • Up to 20% for repeated non-compliance.

  • Периодические штрафные выплаты of up to 5% of daily turnover.

Yes, you read that right. Double the financial impact compared to the DSA.

What Triggers DMA Fines?

  • Refusing to allow interoperability with competing services.

  • Self-preferencing in rankings or display.

  • Using business users’ data to compete against them.

  • Not notifying the Commission about mergers or acquisitions.

These provisions are meant to fundamentally reshape how gatekeepers behave. A “wait и see” approach is no longer viable.

Who Enforces?

  • Solely the European Commission. No national fragmentation here—the goal is consistency и strength.

Special Enforcement Powers

Both acts allow regulators to go beyond fines:

  • Interim measures: Authorities can order platforms to stop practices immediately if there’s a serious risk.

  • Структурные средства правовой защиты: In extreme cases, the Commission can force platforms to divest parts of their business or change ownership structures.

  • Audits и inspections: Regulators can inspect algorithmic systems, data flows, и internal documents.

This is not just enforcement by spreadsheet. It’s hиs-on и hardware-deep.

Are These Penalties Actually Being Used?

Yes—и enforcement is ramping up. In 2023, the Commission began designating gatekeepers и launching investigations. Several VLOPs are already under scrutiny for failing to meet transparency и risk management obligations.

What’s new is not just the size of potential fines, but the speed и certainty of the process. Investigations are no longer open-ended marathons. The Commission is expected to act swiftly, и platforms must be prepared to defend their compliance posture at any moment.

Risk Management = Cost Management

The penalty structures in the DSA и DMA send a clear message: compliance is no longer cheaper than violation. For years, some platforms treated fines as a cost of doing business. That math no longer works.

Being proactive is cheaper than being reactive. Platforms should:

  • Conduct comprehensive compliance audits.

  • Appoint internal teams responsible for DSA и DMA governance.

  • Убедитесь legal representation in the EU (a requirement under both acts).

  • Build traceable documentation for every decision related to moderation, ranking, advertising, or access controls.

In short, plan like you’ll be audited tomorrow—because you might.

Practical Scenarios

Let’s say you’re a VLOP with €20 billion in revenue. You’re late filing your systemic risk assessment и ignore a Commission request for documentation. That’s potentially:

  • €1.2 billion in fines under the DSA

  • Plus, daily penalties until you comply

Or maybe you’re a DMA gatekeeper refusing to let competitors integrate with your messaging app. That’s:

  • €2 billion (10%) fine first time

  • Up to €4 billion (20%) if repeated

These aren’t paper tigers. They’re financial wrecking balls, и regulators are trained to swing.

Финальные мысли

The DSA и DMA don’t just talk tough—they enforce tough. And for once, the consequences are serious enough to demи board-level attention.

The era of “move fast и break things” is being replaced by “move thoughtfully и document everything.” That’s not bureaucratic paralysis—it’s regulatory realism. And as the EU leads the world in platform governance, other jurisdictions are watching—и learning.

For platforms, this is the moment to shift gears from legal defense to proactive strategy. Fines are no longer a possibility. They are, increasingly, a probability. So read the law, hire the experts, и brace your compliance team. Because the next knock on the door might come with a penalty attached—и this time, it’s not just a slap on the wrist.

subscribe

Будьте в курсе

Новые статьи про AI, рост и B2B-стратегию — без шума.

{# No on purpose — see apps.blog.views.newsletter_subscribe for the reasoning (anon pages must not Set-Cookie: csrftoken or the nginx edge cache skips them). Protection is via Origin/Referer in the view, not via the token. #}
$ cd .. # Все посты
X / Twitter LinkedIn

ls -la ./legal-consulting/

Похожие посты

{# Browsers pick the smallest supported format: AVIF → WebP → JPEG. w=640 covers retina mobile + most desktop cards (the slot is ~320 px wide; 640 doubles for 2× screens). #} Права на отзыв и цифровые товары: уроки недавней судебной практики ЕС

Права на отзыв и цифровые товары: уроки недавней судебной практики ЕС

The issue of withdrawal rights and digital goods has become increasingly relevant in the context of e-commerce and consumer protection law within the European Union (EU). As digital goods, such as software, music, e-books, and online subscriptions, have risen in popularity, the application of withdr

~/legal-consulting 10 мин
{# Browsers pick the smallest supported format: AVIF → WebP → JPEG. w=640 covers retina mobile + most desktop cards (the slot is ~320 px wide; 640 doubles for 2× screens). #} Правовой статус рейтингов и отзывов в рамках права ЕС о защите потребителей

Правовой статус рейтингов и отзывов в рамках права ЕС о защите потребителей

Понять правовой статус рейтингов и отзывов в соответствии с законодательством ЕС о защите прав потребителей, а также то, как онлайн-платформы и торговцы обязаны обеспечивать прозрачность и подлинность.

~/legal-consulting 9 мин
{# Browsers pick the smallest supported format: AVIF → WebP → JPEG. w=640 covers retina mobile + most desktop cards (the slot is ~320 px wide; 640 doubles for 2× screens). #} Правовые нормы для трансграничных моделей дропшиппинга в ЕС и за его пределами

Правовые нормы для трансграничных моделей дропшиппинга в ЕС и за его пределами

Dropshipping has become one of the most popular e-commerce models worldwide, especially in the European Union (EU). This business model allows entrepreneurs to sell products to customers without holding inventory, making it appealing for both startups and established businesses. However, as dropship

~/legal-consulting 11 мин