Blog
Zodpovednosť platformy za zlyhania doručenia a prerušenia služieb: Čo potrebujú trhoviská vedieť

Zodpovednosť platformy za zlyhania doručenia a prerušenia služieb: Čo potrebujú vedieť trhoviská

Alexandra Blake, Key-g.com
podľa 
Alexandra Blake, Key-g.com
7 minút čítania
Právne poradenstvo
apríl 24, 2025

As digital marketplaces become the go-to source for everything from groceries to electronics, the question of platform liability is rising in urgency. When delivery fails or a service interruption disrupts a transaction, consumers and sellers alike often look to the platform for answers—and possibly compensation. Platform liability in such cases isn’t just a customer service issue; it carries significant legal and regulatory implications.

In this article, we dive deep into the evolving landscape of platform liability for delivery failures and service interruptions. We will unpack key legal frameworks, explain what constitutes liability, and explore how platforms can mitigate risks without sacrificing user experience. Given the increasingly critical role platforms play in digital commerce, understanding where responsibility begins and ends is essential.

The Scope of Platform Liability in Modern Commerce

Platform liability refers to the legal responsibility a digital platform may bear when its services fail to meet agreed expectations. These services might include product delivery, digital service uptime, payment processing, or communication between buyers and sellers.

While traditional retailers have clear-cut liability under consumer protection laws, online platforms operate in a more complex environment. They may act as intermediaries rather than direct sellers, making it difficult to pin liability on them unless explicitly stated. However, this intermediary status is increasingly under scrutiny, particularly when platforms facilitate the entire transaction process from listing to delivery.

The concept of platform liability becomes more intricate when delivery failures and service interruptions affect thousands — or even millions — of users. Courts and regulators are increasingly testing the limits of what responsibilities platforms owe to their users.

Delivery Failures: Who Is Liable When Orders Don’t Arrive?

1. Understanding Delivery Failures in Marketplace Contexts

Delivery failures occur when a purchased item is not delivered to the buyer within the expected timeframe or is delivered in damaged or incorrect form. These issues can result from:

  • Logistics provider errors
  • Incorrect product listings
  • Third-party seller negligence
  • Platform software glitches
  • Fraudulent activity

When these failures happen, consumers often contact the platform — not the seller or courier. This customer behavior has prompted platforms to assume a greater role in facilitating delivery reliability, which brings with it increased exposure to liability claims.

2. Contractual Terms and Platform Positioning

Whether a platform is legally liable depends heavily on how it positions itself in its user agreements. If the platform merely acts as a facilitator between the buyer and seller, it may argue that it holds no delivery obligation. However, if the platform handles logistics, warehousing, or even offers a guaranteed delivery timeframe, its role shifts closer to that of a retailer.

Platforms like Amazon, for example, provide fulfillment services, in which case they may bear direct liability if a delivery fails. On the other hand, eBay typically positions itself as an intermediary, although it still offers limited guarantees through buyer protection programs.

The takeaway is clear: the more operational control a platform exerts over the transaction, the more likely it is to be held liable for delivery failures.

Service Interruptions: Legal Risks in Downtime and Disruptions

1. What Constitutes a Service Interruption?

A service interruption refers to any event that renders a digital platform inoperable or significantly impairs its functionality. This might include:

  • Server crashes
  • API failures
  • Payment gateway outages
  • DDoS attacks
  • Maintenance downtime exceeding communicated limits

While short-term outages may be viewed as inevitable, prolonged or repeated interruptions can affect sales, damage reputation, and lead to legal disputes. For sellers dependent on these platforms, a downtime period during a key shopping window — such as Black Friday — can result in substantial revenue loss.

2. Legal Grounds for Claims Against Platforms

Customers or sellers affected by service interruptions may file claims based on breach of contract, negligence, or consumer protection violations. The specific grounds vary by jurisdiction but often include:

  • Implied contractual promises of availability or uptime
  • Failure to provide essential services during a transaction
  • Lack of proper notice or support during disruptions

If platforms fail to outline their responsibilities clearly in their terms of service, courts may interpret these omissions unfavorably. As a result, legal precedent is pushing platforms toward more transparent service-level agreements (SLAs) and communication policies.

Platform Liability in Different Jurisdictions

1. United States

In the U.S., platforms often rely on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to limit liability for third-party content or actions. However, this protection does not always extend to operational failures like missed deliveries or service downtimes, especially when the platform controls key parts of the transaction.

Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requires platforms to offer refunds or alternatives when products are not delivered on time, particularly for items promoted with guaranteed delivery windows.

2. European Union

EU law takes a stricter approach, particularly under the Consumer Rights Directive and the Digital Services Act. Platforms are expected to ensure consumer rights are upheld, even when a third-party seller is involved. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that platforms may be liable if they exert control over key aspects of the transaction.

Furthermore, under the GDPR, platforms must ensure that service interruptions do not compromise user data or privacy — adding an additional layer of risk.

3. Asia-Pacific

In regions like Australia and Singapore, consumer protection agencies increasingly require platforms to accept liability for delivery issues and service shortcomings if the platform facilitated the transaction or made performance promises. The trend across jurisdictions is moving toward expanded platform responsibility.

Minimizing Legal Exposure: Strategies for Platforms

1. Clear Terms of Service and SLAs

To limit liability, platforms should maintain transparent terms of service that explicitly define their role in transactions. SLAs should be incorporated when platforms provide services like fulfillment, payment processing, or digital support. These agreements should set realistic expectations for uptime, delivery timelines, and dispute resolution procedures.

2. Insurance and Risk Mitigation Programs

Platformy môžu znížiť vystavenie sa zodpovednosti tým, že ponúknu voliteľné programy poistenia pre predajcov a kupujúcich. Niektoré trhoviská dokonca integrujú logistické poistenie do svojich ponuky služieb, pričom náklady prenesú na predajcov alebo kupujúcich.

Okrem toho môžu platformy využívať bodovanie rizika na hodnotenie spoľahlivosti predajcov a presnosti zásielky, čím sa znižuje riziko zabrániteľných neúspešných doručení.

3. Investovanie do redundancie a infraštruktúry

Na minimalizáciu výpadkov služieb musia platformy investovať do spoľahlivej cloudovej infraštruktúry, pravidelnej údržby serverov a záložných systémov. Patrí k tomu ochrana proti DDoS útokom, monitorovanie v reálnom čase a protokoly obnovy po katastrofách. Čím odolnejší je systém, tým menej pravdepodobné je, že platforma bude čeliť nárokom na prevádzkovú chybu.

4. Reagujúca zákaznícka podpora a centra riešení

Právne spory často pramenia z nedostatočnej komunikácie počas zlyhania. Zriadenie robustných zákazníckych servisných kanálov a automatizovaných systémov riešenia problémov môže znížiť napätie a pomôcť používateľom cítiť sa podporovaní, dokonca počas výpadkov alebo meškaní.

Rýchla a transparentná odpoveď umožňuje platformám často riešiť spory predtým, ako eskalujú do právnych krokov.

Prípadové štúdie: Kedy platformy čelili zodpovednosti

1. Súdne spory spoločnosti Amazon ohľadom doručovania v ten istý deň

Amazon čelil viacerým kolektívnym žalobám pre nedodržanie sľúbenej dodávky v ten istý deň alebo nasledujúci deň. Hoci často vyrieši tieto prípady ponúknutím vrátenia peňazí alebo kreditov, tieto prípady zdôrazňujú právnu zodpovednosť, ktorá prichádza s ponúkaním záruk dodania.

2. Výpadok Shopify v roku 2021

V roku 2021 zažila Shopify rozsiahly výpadok počas špičky nákupnej sezóny. Obchodníci utrpeli značné finančné straty a niektorí zvažovali právne kroky. Napriek tomu, že podmienky Shopify obmedzujú jeho zodpovednosť, tento incident viedol spoločnosť k posilneniu infraštruktúry a lepšej transparentnosti počas výpadkov služieb.

3. Sporné prípady produktov na Marketplace Facebooku

Facebook Marketplace bol kritizovaný pre nedostatok zodpovednosti, keď tretí strany podvádzajú kupujúcich alebo neposielajú produkty. Pretože Facebook nevie priamo vybaviť platby alebo doručenie, jeho zodpovednosť bola obmedzená, ale narastajúca regulačná pozornosť môže túto pozíciu zmeniť v budúcnosti.

Záver: Predefinícia zodpovednosti v platformovom obchode

Keď sa platformy vyvíjajú z pasívnych sprostredkovateľov na aktívnych účastníkov obchodu, hranice platnosti platformy sa menia. Zlyhania doručenia a prerušenia služieb už nie sú len technické problémy – sú to potenciálne právne body, ktoré môžu podkopať dôveru a spôsobiť značné finančné straty.

Na navigáciu tohto meniaceho sa terénu musia platformy proaktívne objasňovať svoje povinnosti, efektívne komunikovať s používateľmi a investovať do systémov, ktoré zabraňujú zlyhaniam. Hoci sa zodpovednosť nedá vždy vyhnúť, dá sa spravovať — a tí, ktorí to robia dobre, si udržia dôveru spotrebiteľov a dlhodobú trhovú dôveryhodnosť.

Riešením zodpovednosti platformy s dôslednosťou a presahom môžu online marketplace spĺňať právne štandardy a zároveň budovať dôveru zákazníkov a posilňovať tak svoju úlohu spoľahlivých usnadňovateľov modernej obchody.